In submitting our comment to PDNPA about the spiritual value of Stanton Moor, we draw on our research to date and on our pilot work which we hope will result in considerably expanded ethnographic work on Stanton Moor and the Peak Park generally. We consider that the spiritual dimensions of the Park - the importance of this area, centrally located in England, for people in the surrounding cities - must not be undervalued. It is hard to quantify the meanings of land and landscape to those individuals and groups who find re-enchantment, restoration or re-creation of self and spirit through direct engagement with the land. Indeed, work done elsewhere among indigenous peoples suggests that quantification cannot adequately reflect these meanings. We consider that a detailed ethnographic study, including narratives of local people, tourists and other park users would greatly benefit knowledge of the park and its spiritual importance. In the meantime, however, we offer some comments from our pilot work. While this is principally concerned with paganisms, the landscape of Stanton Moor has spiritual meaning for many of those who visit.
At some sites, pagans have come forward as 'guardians' of sites: increasingly this seems to be happening at Stanton Moor, with information about the quarrying plans being transmitted through webpages and email lists. In all, pagan understandings of and engagements with these ancient places, and often with associated landscapes including natural features and wildlife, are diverse and complex. They may include elements of (often older) academic interpretations of site and symbol, literature and history, together with folkloric understandings of spirits and local deities, sometimes drawing on narratives from elsewhere (e.g. landvÊttir or 'Landwights' of Iceland), on pieces of earlier folklores (notably guardians and black dogs) or on names known from research (for example Verbeia in Yorkshire; see Gyrus 1997), re-enchanting these in line with how their paganisms understand people, deities and places. Some pagan discourses may focus on sites as places where deities can be approached, or that in some sense symbolise or embody deity: cup-marks as symbolic of 'The Goddess', or Glastonbury Tor and the nearby landscape constituting (or portraying?) her body and/or an astrological zodiac. Other pagan discourses of sacredness instead relate to use of a site by not only human-people, but other beings, possibly as a location where human and other people enter into negotiations and relationships. Animist views hold that rocks, trees, rivers and so forth all have spirit and may all create or inscribe meaning in place. Unlike 'rational' understandings, of archaeologists in particular, in which meaning ‚ scientific, spiritual or otherwise ‚ is seen solely as a process of human inscription on to sites, pagans who make offerings often see 'spirits' of place (such as wights, land sprites and goddesses) as present a priori, as, for want of a better phrase, actually there; sites, stones and spirits are all active contributors to stories of place (Wallis and Blain 2003).
Protestors listed the following problems with the proposals:
And, in their own words, they suggest:
[A]at the time of purchase there was an existing planning permission to re-open the two quarries at Endcliffe and Lees Cross, which had lain dormant since the early 1950's. This permission was granted before the Peak District National Park was founded, and would be entirely inappropriate for today. However, the planning authority seem content to accept the application. If this scheme goes ahead it will not only destroy a part of the world's second most popular National Park (the most popular is in Japan) including a Grade II Listed building (the Earl Grey Tower, a monument erected to commemorate the passing of the 1832 Reform Act) and threaten a sacred site, the Nine Ladies Stone Circle and the rich archaeological landscape of Stanton Moor (http://www.nineladies.uklinux.net/).
The protest website uses the image of an apple 'core' remaining of the moor, holding the Nine Ladies and a single birch tree 'stalk', but with little else remaining, the quarries having taken their 'bites'.
In this 'alternative' representation of Stanton Moor by the protest website, the circle becomes a metaphor for the moor, and pagans and others identify with the circle. However, this living landscape means different things to different groups of pagans: many treat the circle as a ritual focus, a place to meet spirits, deities or ancestors of the moor: others engage with spirit-lines or tracks, or leylines. Some perform ritual at the circle to give energy to stones and land. The Dragon Network, most notably, has suggested a ritual to awaken earth-energies of moor and stones - this being a ritual that people can perform elsewhere, imaging the landscape in order to strengthen the natural (or supernatural) defences of the moor. Other pagans adopt other means of calling on land spirits and/or deities to protect and guard the land.
Some ritual activity leaves traces - offerings, candles and so forth, but much leaves no traces other than those of steady erosion through site use by all 'visitors', pagan or otherwise. It should be mentioned that the protest camp people have been attempting to discourage other pagans from leaving visible offerings, while organisations such as ASLaN (Ancient Sacred Landscape Network) are attempting to provide education for pagan site users, urging that the best offering may be picking up others' litter, but that a song or a libation are offerings that do not disrupt others' enjoyment of the landscape.
In 2001, we photographed protest rituals by a busload of Birmingham pagans, King Arthur Pendragon, and a Dorset druid group, including an attempt to 'raise energy' to 'protect the stones', and an effort to pick up the scraps of litter and cigarette ends festooning the site.
In short, pagans across Britain are concerned about Stanton Moor and the situation of the Nine Ladies. When parts of the circle and its environs were excavated during 2000-1, to investigate extents of recent erosion, local archaeologists took pains to explain purposes of the excavation to protestors and visitors - some of whom then decorated the site with a pentacle, perhaps to protect the land or bless the excavation. Similarly, during the recent restorative work there were attempts to communicate between heritage management and pagan communities. This communication is, in our view, essential.
It is common to find pagans and other spiritual visitors meditating at the Nine Ladies. The peace of the circle is only marginally disturbed by audible beeps and sound from the Dale View Quarry. However, the proximity of the Lees Cross and Endcliffe planned quarries would mean that this peace would be disrupted for visitors. Comments expressed to us range through concern about sound disturbance to the ambience, concern about wildlife habitat destruction, and ideas of the landscape of the moor as a single unit and the relationship of cairns and burials to the circles (not only the Nine Ladies). A constant strand in comments is that going ahead with quarrying based on the 1952 permission makes mockery of all the focus on environment and landscape, and environmental science and legislation, that has arisen since. One comment was from a building product supplier was:
Stanton Moor, the Nine Ladies, other sacred sites, moorland and archaeological finds in the area are under threat by plans to quarry for building material. While we need such work to be done, there are appropriate and inappropriate places to conduct quarrying. No guesses required where this falls! (25/02/04)
With the December 2003 application from Marshalls plc, pagan concern about quarrying has intensified, especially with the increase in stone planned to be extracted, and hence the quarry company's apparent disregard of representations from heritage and scientific organisations. Indeed, pagans, reading new protest camp leaflets, are raising questions online and in person about 'who benefits' from the quarrying. According to the leaflet, the landowner, the Haddon Estates, under the direction of Lord Edward Manners, would allegedly gain a considerable sum (the protesters suggest £100 million) if the Endcliffe/Lees Cross quarries were activated and stone taken out as per the new application. The protesters argue, via their current leaflet, that the Duke of Rutland should be protecting the land not selling parts of it off for shipping overseas or for new housing developments. These ideas are now being discussed in wider forums.
References
Bender, Barbara (1998) Stonehenge: Making Space. Oxford:Berg.
Blain, Jenny (2002) Nine Worlds of Seidr-Magic: Ecstasy and Neo-shamanism in North European Paganism. London:Routledge
Chippindale, C., Devereux, P., Fowler, P., Jones, R. and T. Sebastian. 1990. Who Owns Stonehenge? Manchester: Batsford.
Gyrus. 1997. The Goddess in Wharfedale. Available online: http://norlonto.net/index.cfm/action/articles.view/itemID/66
Harvey, Graham (1997) Listening People, Speaking Earth: Contemporary Paganism. London:Hurst and Co.
Wallis, Robert J. & Jenny Blain (2003) 'Sites, sacredness, and stories: interactions of archaeology and contemporary Paganism', Folklore 114: 307-321.
Wallis, R.J. 1999. Autoarchaeology and Neo-shamanism: The Socio-Politics of Ecstasy. PhD Thesis, Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton.
The Sacred Sites, Contested Rights/Rites project is directed by Dr Jenny Blain (Sheffield Hallam University) and Dr Robert J. Wallis (Richmond University).
The Sacred Sites Project welcomes enquiries from potential researchers or potential post-graduate students with an interest in this area.
The Sacred Sites Project welcomes enquiries from those with an interest in promoting or sponsoring research in this area.
| sacred sites home |
news & press releases |
discussion documents |
reports & statements |
papers & articles |
specific sites |
photo gallery |
links |
email us |
book shop | J. Blain webpages |